Wimbledon may also must growth its prize money extensively and change the way it’s far dispensed if main gamers have their manner. While the winners of the singles occasions at this yr’s championships will every acquire £2.35 million (€2.6 million) and first-spherical losers will earn £45,000 (€50,000), many gamers accept as true with that Wimbledon, the other 3 Grand Slams and Masters one thousand events aren’t paying them a big enough percent of sales. The distribution of the prize pot within the Grand Slams also needs correcting. They are saying that at the same time as Roger Federer is among folks who need more money given to the sport’s lower ranges.
The overall quantity provided to Wimbledon players has more than doubled given that 2012, with £38 million (€42.35 million) on provide in 2019. However, prize money as a percent of sales at the 4 Grand Slams is commonly mentioned to be between 12-15 in line with cent. At the 2018 US Open, the total prize fund (men and women) of $ fifty-three million become the best 13.Nine in keeping with cent of its reputable revenue of $380.14 million.
The men’s ATP player council meets at Wimbledon on Friday with prize money and fairness high at the timetable. Vasek Pospisil, a Canadian who received the men’s doubles name at Wimbledon in 2014, instructed the Guardian: “Tennis is a big enterprise, so while you carry a sure price to the desk, you need to be compensated for this reason. It’s no longer even a lot the dollar determines; it’s the proportion. Essentially the tournaments have a monopoly of the entire Tour due to the fact they’re in power and that they don’t should be held chargeable for something so that they literally deliver what they experience like giving.”
Pospisil is a member of the 10-guy participant council board, led via sector No 1, Novak Djokovic. Until currently, the Grand Slams were reluctant to share an in-depth breakdown of their monetary accounts. The Masters one thousand events, wherein prize money as a share of sales is higher but varies significantly, were much less coming near, leaving gamers in the darkish.
All I actually need is the possibility to have an expert [legal] representation so that we will come to the desk, they [tournaments] can make their arguments, and they can say: ‘Guys, that is why we will supply the identical to tennis gamers that the NBA does or NFL does [50 percent] because tennis is complicated,’” he said. “It might not be 50 in keeping with cent; it is probably 30 in line with cent. Maybe it’s for what it’s far now; I don’t understand. The point is we’re no longer even given this possibility.
Picking up £ forty-five 000 for losing in the first round may appear lots; however, Pospisil, who has a singles ranking of 188 as he returns after again surgical procedure, stated charges are high. “Even in case you’re ranked 80 to one hundred, and you’re making the Slams, yeah, you’re making $2 hundred,000 [first-round loser money in all four] and [people might] assume you’re set,” he stated. But then there’s tax, prices, team, travel for 35 weeks as 12 months. For being top a hundred in a game that makes as tons cash as it does, that’s not sufficient.
Federer informed journalists in Halle closing week the Challenger Tour wanted to assist. Pospisil agreed. “On the Challenger Tour, they earn peanuts. If the 4 Grand Slams decided to present a couple of million greenbacks each – that is nothing [for them] – to the Challenger Tour, [it would benefit] guys who are ranked three hundred to one hundred, most of [whom] are losing money.
A spokesperson for Wimbledon stated prize money tiers have been “appropriate,” and it’s miles too easy to awareness on that trouble alone. “In the beyond 3 years, for instance, we’ve got added new dressing rooms, stretch and heat-up facilities for gamers and their assist agencies in all of the activities performed on the championships consisting of juniors and wheelchair activities. This is alongside the ongoing development in player offerings along with delivery, statistics, food and drink and much extra.” – Guardian.